Cash on delivery, or paid upfront?

Why cash on delivery dominates in Egypt

Cash on delivery is the default in the Egyptian market for one simple reason: it takes the risk off the buyer entirely. Someone seeing a page for the first time does not know whether the work is real, whether the piece looks like the photos, or whether the page will still exist tomorrow. Cash on delivery answers all of that without a word being exchanged: the parcel is opened and the piece is inspected before a single pound changes hands. The practical result is a clearly higher share of conversations that end in a completed order — especially with a first-time buyer, and especially on the more expensive pieces.

What cash on delivery actually costs

What gets forgotten is that this reassurance is paid for, and the maker is the one paying: • Refused parcels. A parcel can be turned away at the door for any reason — a change of mind, an unanswered phone, nobody home. The piece comes back, and the hours and the packaging are gone. • Money arrives late. The amount is collected after delivery, so materials bought for the order are funded out of the maker's own pocket until it closes. • Made-to-order work is the sharpest edge. A piece made to a size, a name or a requested colour cannot be resold to somebody else if it is refused. That is a total loss, not a delay. So cash on delivery raises the share of orders that close, and raises the share of orders that come back, at the same time.

Upfront payment: what it fixes and what it breaks

Paying upfront inverts the arrangement: the money is collected before the piece is dispatched. What it fixes: casual refusals nearly disappear — someone who has already paid rarely turns the parcel away. Materials are bought out of the order itself rather than out of savings. And made-to-order work is covered before any of it is made. What it breaks: a new buyer's trust. Asking for the full amount before anything at all, from a page seen for the first time, stops a meaningful share of people at exactly that step. Not because the work is unconvincing — because all of the risk has just been moved onto them. That is why upfront payment works well with a returning buyer, and considerably less well on a first order.

The partial deposit: the middle path

There is a third arrangement that borrows from both: part of the amount is paid as a deposit, and the rest on delivery. The deposit covers materials and makes the order serious. The balance at the door preserves the buyer's right to see the piece before completing payment — the inspection survives intact, and the risk is split rather than assigned. That changes the question from "trust me completely or there is no sale" to "each side carries part of it". In a chat that framing is far easier to say, because it reads as fair without needing a paragraph of explanation. A partial deposit makes the most sense for made-to-order work, for expensive orders, and for any piece that would have no second buyer if it came back.

When each one fits

A practical summary: • New buyer + ready-made piece + moderate price → cash on delivery. • Made-to-order work (a size, a name, a requested colour) → a partial deposit at minimum. • Expensive order → a partial deposit sized to cover materials. • Returning buyer whose last order completed → whichever they prefer. The point that gets missed: the arrangement does not have to be the same for every order. Varying it by piece and by buyer is entirely reasonable — provided the condition is stated in the same conversation before the order is confirmed, not after.

How to say it in the chat

How the condition is phrased matters as much as the condition. What works: a short reason plus a clear number. "This one is made to your size, so there's a 100 EGP deposit for materials and the rest on delivery." What does not: a blanket policy with no reason. "We don't work without a deposit." The difference is that the first explains a real risk being shared, while the second reads as an arbitrary rule imposed because somebody was once burned. And one last thing, which is the most important: the condition is stated before the order is confirmed. A condition that appears after agreement damages trust more than any other, however reasonable it is.

Common questions